What does this mean? To put it simply, when the market opened sharply higher yesterday, the main institutions were unwilling to chase after it, so the decrease in buying was very obvious. However, the selling of institutional seats was basically the same as that on Monday. This shows that the main institutions did not deliberately borrow good shipments yesterday. In terms of hot money, it was still a net inflow yesterday.This trend is very similar to that from July 11 to July 19 this year. The market has always maintained a broken upward trend. As long as it falls, there will be funds to support it!It can be seen that the power of shorting yesterday mainly comes from two aspects. In addition, the willingness of the main institutions to undertake is not strong, which eventually forms a situation in which the whole market is high and low.
First, compared with any other funds, the national team is more familiar with the macro-adjustment strategy of the top level, and enters the market accurately before the Politburo meeting, mostly knowing that there will be great benefits at the meeting. Therefore, entering the venue last Friday can avoid chasing after the meeting, which has a greater cost advantage!Then why is this trend happening? Many investors may think that yesterday's A shares opened higher and went lower under the favorable stimulus of the Politburo meeting, which is very similar to last year's 828 market and the trend on October 8 this year. But in your brother's view, these three false yin lines are just similar in shape, but the cores are not the same.Then why is this trend happening? Many investors may think that yesterday's A shares opened higher and went lower under the favorable stimulus of the Politburo meeting, which is very similar to last year's 828 market and the trend on October 8 this year. But in your brother's view, these three false yin lines are just similar in shape, but the cores are not the same.
What does this mean? To put it simply, when the market opened sharply higher yesterday, the main institutions were unwilling to chase after it, so the decrease in buying was very obvious. However, the selling of institutional seats was basically the same as that on Monday. This shows that the main institutions did not deliberately borrow good shipments yesterday. In terms of hot money, it was still a net inflow yesterday.Of course, today's trading data has not yet been released, and Jun Ge only guessed the organization's position adjustment behavior based on experience. Whether this is the case or not, the answer will be clear after the data of the dragon and tiger list of the exchange comes out.If institutions and hot money are not the main force of yesterday's smashing, how did yesterday's high opening and low walking form?
Strategy guide
12-13
Strategy guide
12-13
Strategy guide 12-13